An Open Letter to Brandon University Board of Governors from a BUFA Member
posted October 20, 2011
October 13, 2011
Members of the Brandon University Board of
Governors
Dear Board Members:
I am writing to you in my capacity as a
past-member of the 2008 Brandon University Presidential Search Committee. I was
the Faculty of Science representative on the Presidential Search Committee (18
regular plus four ex officio members
) and one of four members chosen by the committee-as-a-whole to conduct
preliminary interviews of short-listed candidates. The 2008 faculty strike
occurred while this committee was conducting its search for a new President and
the negative fallout that arose out of that strike was clearly on the minds of
committee members. It was the virtually unanimous view of the Committee that the
two most important tasks of any new President would be to: 1) improve labour
relations at Brandon University (i.e. avoid another strike) and 2) operate the
Administration of Brandon University in an open and collegial fashion so as to
foster engagement by Faculty, Staff and Students (i.e. repair the damage of the
previous strike). As things have unfolded, it would appear that we made a poor
choice in our selection of a President for Brandon University. The Faculty are
back on strike (failure in task #1) and the trust between the faculty and the
administration are at an all time low (failure in task #2).
What is particularly unsettling is that
this strike could easily have been avoided. From the Faculty perspective there
were no major outstanding issues (unlike the 2008 strike where there were real
concerns about the pension plan). There were differences on salary but that
could have been worked out (it always is). The major difficulty is the attempt
by the Administration to extensively re-write the Collective Agreement so as to
effectively replace the current collegial model of faculty/university relations
with a top-down, fear-driven one. This is not something that the Faculty will
accede to without a fight. What has been
particularly troubling during this round of negotiations is the apparent
distain the Administration holds for the Faculty- labeling us “inferior and
second-rate”. This lack of respect for faculty is clearly shown by the attempt of
the Administration to break the union by encouraging members to cross the
picket line. Universities in Canada operate largely on a collegial model with
faculty sitting on virtually every decision-making body in the institution. How
well does the Administration think these committees will operate after it has
gone out of its way to encourage divisions among faculty members? Even if the
Administration “wins” in getting members to cross picket lines, it will lose in
terms of engagement and cooperation. What Brandon University needs is a coming
together, not a driving apart.
A third prolonged strike will have
devastating consequences for Brandon University. Students will move elsewhere. Student
enrollment is already an issue- no increase in 25 years while enrollments at
other universities have soared. Similarly, recruitment of faculty members will
suffer. Faculty members want to teach
and conduct their research, not walk the picket line. Why would the provincial
government even consider establishing a medical school here if we’re always
going on strike? I could go on, but I’m sure you are well aware of how badly the
current situation could impact Brandon University.
I urge you, as a faculty member who has
devoted 27 years of my working life to Brandon University, to act quickly to
resolve this strike. The Board of Governors is ultimately responsible for the
operation of the university. All it would take is a phone call from the Chair
of the Board to end this strike. I urge
you to ensure that this happens. Remember that the President of Brandon
University works for you, not the reverse!
Yours sincerely,
Dr. Peter Rombough, Professor
Department of Biology
Brandon University
|